Acknowledgement

What became clear to me, at that moment, was that my identity would significantly shape my journey in ways good and bad. To answer the clerk’s question more fully: I am Indian American, born in Massachusetts, and the son of immigrants from the state of Gujarat in western India. I am in my thirties, having thru-hiked the A.T. in my late twenties. But I grew up on trails, hiking in the Berkshires, White Mountains, and Maine since childhood. I am queer and live with my boyfriend who is a recent immigrant from India. I am part of a family that can claim to have lived the American dream, immigrating to the United States during the height of the technology boom and slowly moving up the economic ranks to an upper-middle-class status. I am educated, having been schooled at top-notch institutions, and I am also professionally successful, having worked in senior management for both for-profit and nonprofit organizations.

Shalin with his Mom, Raju Desai, at Delaware Water Gap, where his parents came to meet and resupply him during his thru-hike. –By Bhupen Desai

All these markers shape my Trail experience. My race and sexuality have been markers that have resulted in negative experiences along the A.T. — from one hiker suggesting my Trail name be “Osama bin Hikin” or an A.T. community resident asking me if I was comfortable living in such obvious sin, being attracted to my own sex. My education and economic status, meanwhile, have given me access, opportunity, and comfort beyond most. The experience I had thru-hiking not only the A.T., but also the Pacific Crest Trail and the Continental Divide Trail, were marked by these personal facts and made my experiences hiking each of these trails distinctly my own.

That is both the pleasure and the problem of talking about the Trail experience. While we talk about the “A.T. experience” in monolithic ways, it is a catch-all term for the near-infinite personal experiences each of us has while recreating on the Trail. These experiences are conditioned by who we are and how our identities are perceived. To ensure that each of us has a safe, welcoming, and inclusive Trail experience, we all must acknowledge that this near-infinite range of Trail experiences exist. That my Trail experience is not yours. And yours is not mine. That both are real and different.

We must also acknowledge that just because one person had a positive experience on the A.T. — free of discrimination, harassment, and discomfort — that the same may not be true for someone else with a different set of identities. The A.T. is not a separate reality from the rest of the world and is prone to racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, ageism, and other forces that can make it a less welcoming, less safe, and less inclusive space. It is also a product of history and is structured by the same forces that the rest of society has been shaped by.

To ensure that each of us has a safe, welcoming, and inclusive Trail experience, we all must acknowledge that a near-infinite range of Trail experiences exist.

A Commitment to Justice

Recognizing the Trail experience can vary significantly from person to person, the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) has worked to ensure that its management and protection of the A.T. is underscored by a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. In 2015, the ATC identified broader relevancy as one of its main strategic priorities with the stated purpose of engaging a younger and more inclusive audience with the A.T. The ATC added a suite of programs from youth summits to education workshops to expand and diversify its network of doers and dreamers. The Next Generation Advisory Council — comprised of fifteen 18 to 30-year-old leaders — was convened to advise and to support the ATC’s broader relevancy efforts. Connections were made to partner organizations through summit seekers — an inter-generational outdoor leadership training program designed to foster inclusion and engagement of communities of color with outdoor recreation and environmental stewardship — and other programs meant to expand the relevancy of recreating on and stewarding the A.T.

Then the tragic murder of George Floyd happened. The systematic and targeted marginalization of Black people, and the violence inflicted upon them, was nothing new. But the murder of George Floyd thrust a range of topics that were previously on the margins of conversations to the forefront: racism, white privilege, white supremacy, and racist violence. While we understood that we were dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic for only a few weeks at the time of the murder, the centuries-long pandemic of American racism moved to the front of our collective consciousness.

It was then that the ATC realized its need to commit to something larger and deeper: not just broader relevancy but justice. As managers of a public resource, our work is and should be informed by a commitment to environmental and social justice. If the resource we manage is not as safe, as welcoming, and as inclusive as it could be, then we have substantial work to do. Recognizing this, the ATC’s “A Commitment to Justice” letter was shared with our constituents and, in a matter of hours, sparks flew.

“Rocks and trees don’t see color.” “Stick to the Trail.” “Last time I checked, social justice and Trail maintenance are not the same thing!” “Black people can hike the A.T., just like me. If they don’t come, it’s not our fault.” These are just a few of the comments we received — among hundreds — the morning after the letter was posted. Among the comments decrying the letter, the most common themes were a denial that racism or discrimination exists on the Trail or in Trailside communities, that justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion were not part of the ATC’s mission or vision, and that Black people were always welcome to the Trail but chose not to come. We knew we had a problem.

Acknowledgement, Education & Action

Problems must be named before they are solved. The comments we received helped us name the problem we are currently confronting. When it comes to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion, we are developing plans based on an incomplete understanding of how we got to where we are and what the ATC can do to craft a more inclusive, safer, more welcoming, and more diverse A.T. As a conservancy and as a broader Trail community, we must learn before we do. The process we identified starts with acknowledgement, proceeds with education, and results in action.

Acknowledgement is the beginning. In the ATC’s “A Commitment to Justice” letter, we acknowledged the issues at hand: “The A.T. is not racially or ethnically diverse. It is not accessible to people from low-income communities. It is not always a safe place for women. and, it is not relevant to many people we consider to be part of the next generation. We recognize this must change.”

However, knowing how we got to this place requires us to engage in an understanding of our entire history, including the history that preceded the A.T. We must understand that public lands are stolen lands — lands acquired by the forced removal or genocide of the land’s indigenous communities. We must understand that the A.T., while a recreational opportunity to some, traverses the routes which slaves once used to escape the antebellum south. We must recognize that some Trail management practices, whether intentionally or unintentionally, led us to a demographic that is largely male, largely Caucasian, largely above 55 years old, and largely affluent.

By gaining an understanding of our entire history and acknowledging (and naming) the full range of problems we are confronted with, we can educate — and ultimately act — in a way that creates more robust and resilient solutions to today’s problems.

We will invest in change, with our time and our money. But we also recognize that this issue of A.T. Journeys is part of a larger conversation about who we are and how we got here — and how we will change. It is important to recognize upfront that we will make mistakes. That this must be a broad-based effort, with those who have remained silent in the past speaking up and engaging in the process. And, that we must approach each other with empathy, civility, and understanding. That some of the things we want to discuss will likely lead to discomfort is not an attempt to fuel guilt, but rather to acknowledge that there is a problem and, more importantly, there is a path forward.

This will not be easy, but it will result in a better and broader Trail community. We hope you will join us in this journey.

Shalin Desai is the Vice President of Advancement
for the Appalachian Trail Conservancy